Hi, My interest in the vert.x connector is not so much in the http connector itself as in being able to use the Restlet api inside of a vert.x environment. Similar to how I can now use restlet inside a JEE environment.
My ideal situation is to be able to write my rest resources in Restlet and deploy it in any environment. Be it simple/jetty/tomcat/grizzly or now vert.x. It is vert.x build in support for WebSockets and SockJs that is making me, in particular, interested in using it. Thanks Pieter On 21/06/2013 03:26, Jerome Louvel wrote: > Hi Pieter, > > As long as it brings value compared to the existing Jetty and Simple > connectors, in term of scalability and throughput for example, then it > definitely makes sense. > > The issue with extension is that they need to be documented and > maintained on the long run, so it needs to really make a difference :) > > Best regards, > Jerome > -- > http://restlet.org <http://restlet.org/> > http://twitter.com/#!/jlouvel <http://twitter.com/#%21/jlouvel> > > > > > 2013/6/20 Pieter Martin <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Hi, > > Is a http connector for using restlet inside http://vertx.io/ > something > that would be considered? > > Thanks > Pieter > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=3058658 > > > Your personal email. Anytime, anywhere. > Ridiculously affordable at $19.95. No contracts. > http://www.getpeek.com/lavabit.html ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=3058807
