Hi Tal, In RF 3.0, we should really give more precise control regarding extensions usage for:
- connectors - converters - authenticators The configuration of a Restlet component or application should be explicit and fully available programmatically. I'm even considering fully removing the classpath based auto-registration as it seems to create more problems than solutions. Best regards, Jerome 2013/11/26 Tal Liron <[email protected]> > Actually, it's a feature I would like to see with *all* Restlet > extensions: it would be nice for users to be able select which extensions > they want to use, rather than configure it solely via the classpath. > > Possibly with Java properties? I can imagine every extension class having > an "enabled" property. > > > Thanks Tal, this looks great. We might want to add parameters to > > disable/enable the client/server connector from the extension as a second > > step to allow mixing of several connector extensions. > > > > I've added a note about this to the matching ticket: > > https://github.com/restlet/restlet-framework-java/issues/512 > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=3069272 > ------------------------------------------------------ http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=3070788
