Hello,

>Restlet now complains that the content length must be greater than or
equal to zero.
>As pointed out by other posters, this is an artificial constraint imposed
by Restlet. In many cases, the URI itself carries sufficient information.
If I have a look at the HTTP specifications (
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.13), I'm
inclined to say that things are quite clear:

Content-Length    = "Content-Length" ":" 1*DIGIT

Where "digit" is defined as follow (
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec2.html#sec2.2):

 DIGIT          = <any US-ASCII digit "0".."9">

Which is only an answer to this single mail.


Don't worry, I don't forget the global topic, but unfortunately I need a
little bit time to answer you.

Best regards,
Thierry Boileau


2014-07-14 17:20 GMT+02:00 Frank Kolnick <[email protected]>:

> I tried setting the content length to -1, as per MSDN:
> "The ContentLength property contains the value of the Content-Length
> header returned with the response. If the Content-Length header is not set
> in the response, ContentLength is set to the value -1."
>
> Restlet now complains that the content length must be greater than or
> equal to zero.
>
> As pointed out by other posters, this is an artificial constraint imposed
> by Restlet. In many cases, the URI itself carries sufficient information.
>
> I.e., please stop doing that :-)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=3085083
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://restlet.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4447&dsMessageId=3085197

Reply via email to