Does this -need- a proposal to happen? Historically we have reserved proposals to large changes to how the community conducts it's business. Organizing projects to avoid squished toes and bruised egos is great, but I guess I'm not sure we need an official structured work group to get shelves built or pallet floors put together. I don't have any hard issues with this(ie; would not block) on the face, just wondering if we -need- an official-on-the-books rule to accomplish it. Was this the same problem build@ and bizops@ were supposed to solve? Related: If we make this, will it actually get used? We have a history of poor communication.
regards, Andrew L On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Philip P. Patnode <ppatn...@gmail.com>wrote: > Craig, > > Add me to the list. > > I will be happy to help in any way I can. > > A good plan and a project leader will be an effective solution to the > chaos now in progress. > > Philip > > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Steve Radonich IV <nesfr...@outlook.com>wrote: > >> I love this idea Craig. I would definitely second it. >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 01:12:54 -0400 >> From: mm1...@gmail.com >> To: discuss@synhak.org >> Subject: [SH-Discuss] c-bog >> >> >> I am working on a proposal for a C-BOG >> (community build-out group, (hyphen added for awesomeness when saying out >> loud)) >> In neo-synhak fashion I'm trying to talk with groups of people >> individually before making a proposal that someone would go as far as to >> block. As with the last one I researched (laptop-gate era), I'm willing to >> drop if it will start a civil war. >> >> I feel most of our drama comes from too many cooks in the kitchen; the >> sooner many of us can feel like they can do their own projects again >> without feeling selfish if they are at the space and not working on >> infrastructure, the better. It has breed entitlement, countless >> disagreements on how things "must" be done, and the worst: fights on who >> the space owes more. (hint: the answer should be nobody, ever.) >> >> The idea of the proposal is to create a separate and temporary standard >> forman/project-lead/helper organizational structure of volunteers working >> towards a build-out goal consensed by the membership, funded by a >> cash-on-card budget (in the area of $2-4k). The treasurer would be >> instrumental in this process. In my head, this is little more than walls, >> details, and purchasing of tools so many members who have walked away >> (during this struggle) have de-donated. Other than the piles of stuff >> being where the racks were, the place looks mostly the same since March. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> p.s. >> If we had a guideline that: don't say anything you wouldn't say to >> someone's face. I'm guessing the bulk of the last few days email would not >> have been sent thanks to knowledge of what responses words can have when >> your not looking at your target through a computer screen. We will all see >> each other again, we live in the same community and share the same love of >> something that exists at a single physical location. Why people would use >> such strong words over email instead of directly to their adversary's face >> I must not grasp. >> >> _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@synhak.org https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> Discuss@synhak.org >> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@synhak.org > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@synhak.org https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
