Paul, Also keep in mind that the CF version is
fairly new compared to the Dot Net (old ASP) version. On a project I
worked on in the past I found it odd they actually sold a beta. But the
good thing is I think for the money you can definitely get some great built in
functionality. Cody From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Morton I am interested in feedback on Able
Commerce . I have a client that is very interested in moving to that
package, and would welcome your thoughts on any support issues,
performance, or implementation issues. Any thoughts on the Dot Net version vs. the CFMX version
would also be helpful. Paul Morton ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by FusionLink ------------------------------------------------------------- |
Title: Message
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Paul Morton
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Cody Wehunt
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Cody Wehunt
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Cody Wehunt
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Paul Morton
- Re: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Cameron Childress
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Paul Morton
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Cody Wehunt
- Re: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Cameron Childress
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce chamer
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Robert Reil
- RE: [ACFUG Discuss] OT: Able Commerce Robert Reil