Charlie and ALL!!

 

Thanks for your great notes and details of each course. I will look into all of these options.

 

I will probably do the book / study group / build a simple app method. I have no interest in building .CFCs at this time. Im not looking for a career change, just attaining some knowledge as a means to an end to build or manage some areas of growth if I do it myself or sub it out.

 

Thanks again.

 

Robert P. Reil

Managing Director,

Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc.

4292 Country Garden Walk NW

Kennesaw, Ga. 30152

Office 770-974-8851

Fax 770-974-8852

www.motorcyclecarbs.com


From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 10:59 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Discernment (was "Learning Cold Fusion")

 

As you've hear, Robert, there are a wide variety of opinions of how best to learn about CF. I think it's worthwhile, though, to consider that learning CF is like learning other subjects: the learners (and the teachers) come to their respective tasks with different expectations and of course vastly different backgrounds (I mean within the students, or within the teachers, and of course between the two).

 

Think of learning to paint, or do woodwork, or work on cars. Some just want to tinker and dabble. Others want to become professionals. Clearly, the former shouldn't jump to the latter without adequate training and experience. Similarly, some teach a topic presuming the learner just want to dabble, while others teach like the learner is intending to become a professional (or, still another perspective, a professional teacher).

 

Both the student and the teacher (and those helping either) would do well to remember these distinctions, because some resources will be great for the dabbler (to help them get started and at least get something done), but they could indeed fail to instill the best practices that will help you as a budding professional. 

 

I guess it's like learning to walk before we run. Or maybe it's like teaching a child to read. Some will let it occur naturally and with children's books, while others will incite the children to read more advanced texts, because they think it will better train them.

 

I'm really not arguing that either camp is right, in learning to/teaching to read or program. Just putting out there that there are these differences, and that you should be aware that some will argue a topic from a position of staunch advocacy--and with your best interests in their heart. It's up to each of us to be discerning about what resources make the most sense for our stage and intentions, lest we avoid being led into the deep too soon.

 

I suppose we could relate it to learning to swim, too, but that's enough analogies and similes for one day. :-)

/charlie

 


-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by FusionLink
-------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to