Robert, What you write is true in the sense that you gain as much efficiency as the author(s) of a framework had at expressing whatever design or architecture they had in mind. If you choose a poor design / architecture and implement that into a framework, even if the framework is written really well, you still end up with a relatively poor tool. So if I go about creating a MVC framework with an imperfect understanding of the design pattern or an imperfect understanding of the problem I am only going to be able to create a solution that solves my imperfect understanding of the problem. This is important to keep in mind. Frameworks are no silver bullet. I don't mean to make like they are.
Making good, reliable and cost effective software is extremely hard. Frameworks can really help a lot. Jeremy Robert Reil wrote: > > Jeremy: > > EXCELLENT job! I go it now I think. > > To paraphrase: > > In coding there are many ways to get to the same result. Some ways are > more efficient than others. These “WAYS” are what comprises the > “FRAMEWORK” that is a compilation of “Best Practices”. > > Using the FRAMEWORK guarantees maximum efficiency in your code so you > end up doing the same thing the same way, the right way (as proven by > a team of veteran developers over time as a consensus). > > I got the whole Standards, Methodology thing. > > Thanks so much for the clarification. > > Robert P. Reil > > Managing Director, > > Motorcyclecarbs.com, Inc. > > 4292 Country Garden Walk NW > > Kennesaw, Ga. 30152 > > Office 770-974-8851 > > Fax 770-974-8852 > > www.motorcyclecarbs.com <http://www.motorcyclecarbs.com> > ------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com -------------------------------------------------------------
