Yep, that was it (the browser was stripping it). Thanks for the tip(s). 

/charlie
http://www.carehart.org/blog/

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean H. Saxe
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 10:27 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: [sdcfug-d] difference between
CGI._http_host and CGI.server_name

Charlie,

That may be your browser removing the default port.  Try telnet to localhost
port 80.  Then try:

GET /index.cfm HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:80

Alternatively, use Paros (www.parosproxy.org) and check the host value being
sent by the browser.  FWIW, the host header is not required and is most
useful for multihomed servers.

-dhs


Dean H. Saxe, CISSP, CEH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Free speech exercised both individually and through a free press, is a
necessity in any country where people are themselves free."
     -- Theodore Roosevelt, 1918


On Sep 17, 2006, at 9:39 PM, Charlie Arehart wrote:

> Well your finding would be more consistent with what the http specs 
> (which as I noted said it should include the port). And you're using 
> the built-in web server in CFMX (port 8500), so again this shows how 
> things can differ among web servers. That said, I happened to notice 
> in my testing again using localhost:80 that for some reason it was 
> being removed in the URL (and therefore not in the http_host). When I 
> changed IIS to use port 81, I see then that when I requested the URL 
> with :81, it did indeed show it in the http_host. So if you want to be 
> able to test for the server name without worrying about the port (if 
> provided), use server_name (and server_port gives that port).
>
> As for your answering here on the ACFUG only, I'm sure the SD folks 
> will appreciate hearing what you found (and perhaps what I've added 
> above). I'll leave the to you as to whether you want to forward this 
> or not to them.
>
> As for an LA CFUG, the conglomeration of a few of them that used to 
> exist did die out, but I see one called http://www.laadug.org/ that 
> does show a CF topic in September.
>
> /charlie
> http://www.carehart.org/blog/
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 8:06 PM
> To: discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: [sdcfug-d] difference between 
> CGI._http_host and CGI.server_name
>
> Thanks Charlie for your well-researched reply. (BTW I'm replying to 
> you ONLY via ACFUG as that is where I know you from. How are you 
> doing? Well I'm sure.  I'm in LA now, and CF-wise it's lonely out 
> here. There is NO LACFUG (that I have found at least, PLEASE correct 
> me if I am wrong.)
>
>
> Yes, both variables do report the same thing-with one "small"  
> exception, when running my script on my local machine I get:
>
> cgi.http_host is: 127.0.0.1:8500
>
> and
>
> cgi.server_name is: 127.0.0.1
>
>
> Originally I wrote a little script to strip out the port from the 
> http_host variable before uploading files to fusionlink.  Realized 
> this was not an issue however since I am only interested DNS alias/ 
> domain name (in my application).
>
>
> But still, I was curious: if they are reporting the same value it  
> doesn't matter which I use, but then I was "certain" that there was  
> undoubtedly something I did not know about their inner workings and  
> thus which would be the "best practice" variable to use.
>
>
> So, I guess then, to rephrase my question to ACFUG's members: is  
> there a "best practice" issue here on which variable to use?
>
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
> Dan Kaufman
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie  
> Arehart
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 4:23 PM
> To: discussion@sdcfug.org; discussion@acfug.org
> Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] RE: [sdcfug-d] difference between  
> CGI._http_host and CGI.server_name
>
>
> Dan, you've sent the note to both the ACFUG and SDCFUG, and while I  
> don't generally like to cross-post, it seems to make sense for me  
> to send this one answer to both lists. Someone may offer a more  
> authoritative answer (or correct me if I'm wrong), but here are my  
> thoughts. The simple answer is that they do appear to be the same,  
> but it's worth understanding them in more detail.
>
>
> CGI variables encompass at least two classes of variables: some  
> created by CF, and some passed to it from the web server. Of those  
> passed from the web server, some are defined by the HTTP spec (such  
> as described in detail at http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/ 
> rfc2616-sec14.html) while others are created by the web server  
> vendor. And some of the ones passed from the web server are really  
> generated from the client (and passed through the web server).
>
>
> As such, it's worth keeping in mind that it's always possible that  
> some CGI variables showing on one test environment may not show up  
> in testing done on a different web server or from a different browser.
>
>
> To your question, http_host is one of several variables defined by  
> the HTTP spec (specifically in that URL above at http://www.w3.org/ 
> Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.23), where it's  
> discussed as the "Host" header. As a side note, the formal header  
> names in the spec are changed by CF to adds the http_ prefix, and  
> if they have "-" in their name, CF changes that to "_", so accept- 
> encoding and user-agent become http_accept_encoding and  
> http_user_agent.
>
>
> The CF docs do list some of the CGI variables:
>
>
> - http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/ 
> expres34.htm for 6.1
>
> - http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/wwhelp/ 
> wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm? 
> context=ColdFusion_Documentation&file=00000194.htm and http:// 
> livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/ 
> html/wwhelp.htm?context=ColdFusion_Documentation&file=00000193.htm  
> for CF7
>
>
> But they don't list all of them. I'm not clear on which they choose  
> to list and why. Again, some listed there are from the client (like  
> remote_addr and remote_host), while others are clearly specific to  
> the server (path_translated).
>
>
> The CF7 docs describe server_name as "Server's hostname, DNS alias,  
> or IP address as it appears in self-referencing URLs." The spec  
> above says that the "host" header "specifies the Internet host and  
> port number of the resource being requested" from the URL. My  
> testing of a URL at localhost:80, however, does not show the  
> http_host reflecting the port, though. Perhaps CF strips it out, or  
> the web server.
>
> Unless someone says otherwise from experience in some other  
> particular environment, it seems they both report the same thing.
>
>
> /charlie
>
> http://www.carehart.org/blog/
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:discussion- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 1:26 PM
> To: discussion@sdcfug.org
> Subject: [sdcfug-d] difference between CGI._http_host and  
> CGI.server_name
>
>
> Could anyone explain the difference between CGI.http_host and  
> CGI.server_name?
>
>
> They appear to return the same value.  I'd like to better  
> understand how each one works, the pros and cons of using http_host  
> or server_name.
>
>
> I am currently using cgi.http_host to pull the domain name from a  
> URL to "serve up" a different CSS style sheet based on the domain  
> name in the URL. It has been suggested that I could do exactly the  
> same process using cgi.server_name-and it appears that I would  
> agree with that.  However I've been know to "self doubt" myself, so  
> before I change my script I'd like to understand if there's a  
> benefit, or "better reason" for using one variable or the other.
>
>
> Thanks to all,
>
>
>
> Dan Kaufman
>
>
> 7850 W. Sunset Blvd.
>
> Apt. 209
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90046
>
>
> 818.793.9402
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> www.StudioKaufman.com
>
>
>
> "What  is the distance between the eyes and the soul?"
>
> Fortune Cookie
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @
> http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform
>
> For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
> Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
> List hosted by FusionLink
> -------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=gin.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------






-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to