If you're at the point where everything else is totally optimized and 
requests is the only thing left to address (and is a real issue, not a 
perceived issue), then you should consider moving your images and other 
static assets offsite to a provider like Akamai. Send your non-appserver 
requests to somebody else's farm. 


Shawn Gorrell
Web Development Applications Architect
Federal Reserve Bank - Atlanta
Office (404)  498-8449



Derrick Peavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/18/2007 03:46 PM
Please respond to
discussion@acfug.org


To
discussion@acfug.org
cc

Subject
Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB






Just  to be clear.... the security aspect is of no issue here. I am not 
interested in doing this for security. 

I agree with those who have posted about the con's of doing image 
management in a DB. I don't want to do that.

What I specifically was trying to accomplish is the storage of a finite 
number of images, about 5 total. Each of which are under 5 kb.

The goal was/is that CF could output the one or two images on the front 
page along with the CFML all in one http request. Again, I know it's 
trivial and I know that there is no performance gain per se. But, as 
mentioned in the article I referenced, if currently I have three HTTP 
connections to load a 90k page, and I can take that down to one HTTP 
connection for the same 90k, then 500,000 users per day would be 500,000 
requests per day, not 1.5 million. 

Make sense?

If one assumes that the other aspects of the app are tuned (DB queries, 
CFML, Apache or IIS, hardware, etc., - and that's a big assumption), then 
a final spot would be the HTTP requests. And, that would be more out of 
curiosity than necessity. Although, the end result would certainly be 
desirable, a fast loading, single request which gives the user the feeling 
of a very responsive site. 

Again, thank you to everyone - in fact, I went back and changed my 
httpd.conf file to enable http keep alives - not sure why that was off to 
begin with. So, there has been some positive feedback from all of this! 

_____________ 
Derrick Peavy
Sales and Web Services 
Universal Advertising
Phone: 404-786-5036
Fax: 404-370-0470 
http://www.universaladvertising.com 
http://www.collegeadvertising.com 
http://www.collegeclassifieds.com 
___________________________________

On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Josh Adams wrote:

Sure it's data management.  You could keep text data on the file system 
too but you typically don't--unless maybe it's a lot of text, right?  
Images are no different--if they're not that big, why complicate matters 
by storing them on the file system?  You're already having to do a DB 
lookup to know what to retrieve--that's the crucial difference between 
"page furniture" and data.  But whatever.
 
Josh

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:50 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB

I agree that with strict image security it is an option. Give an image 
only to particular people, etc. But data management? I don't think so, but 
let's just my opinion. Image security is probably the only practical 
example I can think of for doing this, but there again Derrick isn't going 
for that. As far as having html text and the image binary on the same 
'page'...I've never send that before.
 
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Adams
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:42 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB

Not true--there can be a benefits:  data management & security.  Derrick 
started this whole discussion on the BlueDragon Interest list.  I guess he 
brought it here because no one could tell him a technique for doing what 
he wanted on that list.  But over there just as here, people asked the 
"why would you do that?" question about storing images in the DB.  An good 
rule of thumb was put forth:  if it's "page furniture," keep it in the 
file system; if it's data, keep it in the DB.  If it's data, use your data 
management tool (a.k.a. your database) to manage it--why reinvent the 
wheel?  On the security side of things, note that by using <img 
src=".../myheaderimage.cfm">, you can implement all the same security you 
would for any other resource your app serves up.
 
Josh

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:27 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB

Honestly, there's not really a benefit per se. There might be a rare case 
now and then for doing this, but really you should probably just use the 
filesystem for what it's design for, storing files.
 
John
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fennell, Mark 
P.
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:22 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB

I'm just curious. What are the benefits of storing the image in the db 
rather than storing the file on the filesystem and the path in the db? I 
mean, for a web page, all you need is the <img> and the path. I can 
understand how it might be useful in some VB or C or Java app where the 
client doesn't display images with such ease, but for a web app...? 
Thanks.
mf
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:16 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB

I believe there would still be three http requests here. The images would 
still be called up in the html like <img src=""> right? Sorry but in http 
that would still create seperate http requests.
 
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick Peavy
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:35 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: [ACFUG Discuss] Image from DB

Probably an easy problem for someone... 

I want to put two small images in my database and then output them in my 
app, so that they do not constitute additional http requests. Consider it 
an experiment - I know that it may seem a bit silly. The goal is for the 
entire page to be delivered to the browser in one http request, instead of 
3 (two images and one cf page) without doing any Apache tinkering. I have 
looked around the net for answers and cannot seem to make this work. 

Database field is "imageFile" of type BLOB in MySQL 4.1.13. What is the 
proper way to insert the image? 

Example: INSERT into Images (imageFile) values ('#base64(image)#')
-Or-
Example: INSERT into Images (imageFile) values ('#image#')

And then of course, how do you retrieve it? Example: SELECT imageFile FROM 
Images WHERE imageID=1

<cfoutput>
#toString(imageFile)#
</cfoutput>
-OR-
<cfoutput>
#toBinary(imageFile)#
</cfoutput>

As I say, I've not been able to make this work. If I use toString(), I 
simply get the raw data. If I use toBinary(), I get an error that the data 
cannot be converted to a string. Also, using CFCONTENT is fine to output 
the image, but then any code after that is ignored. So, short of saving 
the entire page and then outputting, it, I don't see a way to use 
CFCONTENT.

_____________ 
Derrick Peavy
Sales and Web Services 
Universal Advertising
Phone: 404-786-5036
Fax: 404-370-0470 
http://www.universaladvertising.com 
http://www.collegeadvertising.com 
http://www.collegeclassifieds.com 
___________________________________




------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform 

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists 
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ 
List hosted by FusionLink 
------------------------------------------------------------- 

------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform 

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists 
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ 
List hosted by FusionLink 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform 

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists 
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ 
List hosted by FusionLink 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform 

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists 
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ 
List hosted by FusionLink 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform 

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists 
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ 
List hosted by FusionLink 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform 

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists 
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/ 
List hosted by FusionLink 
-------------------------------------------------------------




-------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, manage your profile @ 
http://www.acfug.org?fa=login.edituserform

For more info, see http://www.acfug.org/mailinglists
Archive @ http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion%40acfug.org/
List hosted by http://www.fusionlink.com
-------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to