I would definitely tend to agree with you.  I also think Adobe has done a
very good job of marketing CF and understanding who their customers are and
their needs.  I just question the reliability of the reasons that Global
Knowledge would have CF on such a list.  The reason given (searching job
boards) just does not pass the litmus test in my mind.

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Andrew Powell <phi1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> By analysts' estimates though, that were shown at cf.Objective() there are
> close to 800,000 CF developers.  This represents a number more than doubled
> since CF 6 was released.  I think it's safe to say it's not a dying skill.
>
>
> On May 18, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Greg McTure wrote:
>
> I've seen CF end up on lists like this in the past but I believe CF is more
> in demand now.  CF skills alone is likely not enough to be highly marketable
> but CF combined with Java, SQL, and some solid business analytical or
> project management skills should make anyone highly competitive I would
> think.
>
> That said, I really am baffled why some well known (like Global Knowledge)
> names common in IT circles continue to list CF as a diminishing skill set.
> What do you all think?
>
> *5. ColdFusion: *ColdFusion users rave that this Web programming language
> is easy to use and quick to jump into, but as many other independent
> software tools have experienced, it's hard to compete with products backed
> by expensive marketing campaigns from Microsoft and others. The language was
> originally released in 1995 by Allaire, which was acquired by Macromedia
> (which itself was purchased by Adobe). Today, it superseded by Microsoft
> .Net, Java, PHP and the language of the moment: open source Ruby on Rails. A
> quick search of the Indeed.com job aggregator site returned 11,045 jobs
> seeking PHP skills compared to 2,027 CF jobs. Even Ruby on Rails, which is a
> much newer technology receiving a major boost when Apple packaged it with OS
> X v10.5 in 2007, returned 1,550 jobs openings on Indeed.com.
>
>
>

Reply via email to