|| On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:08:51 +0000 || MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=3D20051130185547876 mr> Thanks. Interesting summary article. Are you alarmed at the mr> similarities between the Vienna process and the one FSF proposes mr> for GPLv3 discussion? The situation is somewhat different, as the GPLv3 process does not make the claim to be democratic, although it does aim at being as inclusive as possible. Also, while the rules for the Vienna process were never made transparent even throughout the process, the rules for GPLv3 were made transparent before the process even started. That said: I have read your comments on the process very carefully and do understand your unhappiness about the setup and communication. >> and also don't forget to check out >> http://www.fsfe.org/fellows/greve/freedom_bits/fellow_me_say_no_to_vienna_manipulations mr> Will that bitmap be released under a GPL-compatible licence, mr> please? No problem, just dual-licensed it GPL and CC by-sa at your discretion. Regards, Georg -- Georg C. F. Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Free Software Foundation Europe (http://fsfeurope.org) Join the Fellowship and protect your freedom! (http://www.fsfe.org)
pgpsqiQARfbgp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
