> > Note that it claims the FDL purpose is for functional work. > > ... with non-functional parts.
Were that true, then the FDL preamble would be an argument that the FDL is not suitable for applying to invariant sections. Huh? I think a level-headed discussion is impossible if you are going to contradict the licence you claim to support. Please stick to the FDL. I haven't contradicted anything. You are inventing things, and putting words into my mouth. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
