> > Digital signature software like GnuPG might not be distributed > > as signed binaries under GPLv3 unless the archive signing key > > is included, by the looks of that, depending on what "unseal" > > means in court. [...] > > Why should a signing key have to be included? [...]
To unseal the signature block. As posted, it depends what "unseal" means in court. The signature isn't blocking anything here. You don't need the signature to install and/or execute the program in question, so there is nothing to `unseal'. If a signature key was required to run and/or install the program (license key, dongle, come to mind) then the key would have to be included. Cheers. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
