On 23-May-2006, Shane M. Coughlan wrote: > Ben Finney wrote: > > I don't see why you condition evangelism on *not* being business; > > it seems to me evangelism is *all about* selling something. > > Agreed. If we separate evangelism from the concept of selling > something (be it a product, service or idea), then we're left with > something quite vacuous. Evangelism for the sake of evangelism?
Here you seem to encompass selling of a "product, service or idea" as
worthwhile evangelism.
However:
> [...]
> If we go into a board-room to make a sale and fail there is little
> point in suggesting that the presenter has accomplished the
> consolation prize of open-ended advocacy. [...] It's almost
> impossible to measure, and the lack of a sale gives a reasonable
> indication that something has failed somewhere along the line.
By this point you seem to say that the only worthwhile evangelism is
to sell a product or service ("make a sale").
> Call me a scientist, but I prefer results we can measure.
As do I. How then do we measure our success if the purpose of a
particular evangelist is to sell an idea?
--
\ "I know the guy who writes all those bumper stickers. He hates |
`\ New York." -- Steven Wright |
_o__) |
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
