Alex Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think anyone can sensibly argue > that the requirement to publicise a shared secret code/key is not a term > primarily concerned with post-violation compliance.
I'd say it's primarily concerned with pre-distribution decision making. "Shall we tivoise? Oh, looks like we can't." -- Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3 http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ GPLv3 and other work supported by http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
