On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 13:56 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Also, I'd avoid Savannah and GNA for now, unless you know you are > happy with their policies (such as required early adoption of FDL, > or HTTPS-only). > > Which are perfectly fine. Please refrain from spreading FUD. The > requirement for FDL wrt documentation is no different than the > requirement for the GPL or a GPL compatible license when it comes to > software.
PLEASE let's not start this discussion again. It's been done to death. Cheers, Gareth.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
