Bogdan Bivolaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's something four-year-olds know: A screen that ships without a > mouse ships broken. Here's something four-year-olds know: Media > that's targeted at you but doesn't include you may not be worth > sitting still for.
Very nice. I'll take that anecdote and find people who need to learn it :-) > Those are things that make me believe that this is a one-way change. What's the referent of "this"? > Because four year olds, the people who are soaking most deeply in > the current environment, who won't have to go through the trauma > that I have to go through of trying to unlearn a childhood spent > watching /Gilligan's Island/, they just assume that media includes > consuming, producing and sharing. Yes, yes, yes. > "If we carve out a little bit of the cognitive surplus and deploy it > here, could we make a good thing happen?" And I'm betting the answer > is yes." What's "cognitive surplus"? -- \ "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used | `\ when we created them." —Albert Einstein | _o__) | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
