2008/8/27 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "The proprietary argument" was displayed by Apple? The hypocrits...
Well, yes! > Or maybe that's what they wanted, to have proprietary elements to be > considered "essential part of the internet". No, they argued the opposite. (Though their problem is that Java and Flash contain virtual machines, which might be competition for the app store. I expect they were very annoyed they couldn't do Safari without JavaScript.) > If you place foxes defending then henhouse, expect a sudden chicken > count drop. Indeed. However, this issue is not in fact about Apple, it's about the ASA. FSFE may (or may not) be in a position to advocate against the decision that Flash is required to asdvertise "full internet" in the UK. - d. _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
