Are you suggesting that i am abusing you by pointing out that the results
of an election with only one candidate are a foregone conclusion?

On 18 April 2016 at 09:13, Repentinus <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 04/18/2016 01:07 PM, Joe Awni wrote:
> > If you have not had time to read the message, how do you find time to
> > reply at length?
>
> Nowhere in his public e-mail has Erik stated that he has not had enough
> time to read your message.
>
> > Just because you made rules, at a previous date, regarding the structure
> > of the election does not mean you have to waste this election which has
> > only one candidate.
> > *Indeed, its the purpose of the election to let the people decide. *
>
> I explained the purpose of the Fellowship elections to you in my e-mail
> to the list.
>
> > If you insist on not allowing write-ins, I'll call the election and you
> > can just go home.
>
> This kind of abuse will not be tolerated.
>
>
> --
> Heiki Lõhmus
> Coordinator Translations
> Free Software Foundation Europe
> mailto:[email protected]
> xmpp:[email protected]
> http://blogs.fsfe.org/repentinus/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to