JDH services wrote: > BEFORE you force > everyone to write their software for that proprietary architectures.
Huh ? You can treat this rather lean firmware pretty much like a black box if you don't want to touch the AVR. You're also free to use a different microcontroller to communicate with the transceiver. For better or worse, AVR is quite popular in the DIY world, so using one of these chips should enable more people to make experiments with the atusb firmware, should they be inclined to do so. The whole point is to avoid introducing yet another platform with all the dependencies and obstacles this brings. - Werner _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): [email protected] Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
