Ron K. Jeffries wrote: > I hate to say it, but that's a significant investment, money that could be > spent elsewhere.
Hmm, considering how the NSA and related organizations tend to spend their money, having a 24/7 surveillance team do a bit of state-paid tourism in Argentina doesn't sound all that bad :-) > It would be more cost effective to simply eliminate the > threat, if you understand what I'm saying. Hah, I always suspected you were our resident CIA operative ! I better lock away my AK-47 then, considering what is known to have been done in these latitudes ... > You will be missed my friend. Especially on the irc channel, where you are > a voice of reason, a paragon of open hardware/software DIY/Maker > engineering virtue What a nice epitaph ... *snivel* :) > Ron K Jeffries (who's not smart enough to be a threat to anyone except > himself) Hah, an unseen danger, not drawing suspicion wherever he is going, who can strike without a warning and from nowhere. Now there's a person whose house not only needs to be bugged but to be built with surveillance equipment. Even the gravel in the driveway ought to have eyes and ears. Always remember: if you don't see anything suspicious, you didn't look hard enough. The slide with which the NSA justifies the next budget doubling will probably have your picture on it. - Werner _______________________________________________ Qi Hardware Discussion List Mail to list (members only): discussion@lists.en.qi-hardware.com Subscribe or Unsubscribe: http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion
