Cristian Paul PeƱaranda Rojas wrote:
> I would be good consider more options

Do you have any specific chips in mind ?

> before making a choice that
> breaks board compatibility again in the future.

Well, this would hopefully be the last major change for a while.

As far as I know, the nRF51822 is "as good as it gets" in terms
of supporting BTLE.

The openness angle still has to be explored (i.e., it seems that
nobody has done this before), but the documentation looks good
and they even got rid of the silly registration requirement that
had annoyed me in 2014.

The motivation for using AT86RF23x (802.15.4) in 2013/Mk1 was
that I knew of no BT(LE) solution that wasn't entirely closed.
The obvious drawback of that choice was that 802.15.4 isn't
compatible with anything else, so you need a dongle on the "PC"
side - which kinda sucks, particularly if using a smartphone or
tablet.

Then I found the CC2543. I knew at that time of Nordic, but they
seemed to be rather closed (much like the other chip or module
makers). After that, I was hoping that the design was ready for
the next phase and thus didn't want to revise the RF chip
decision, but that changed when the battery problem made it clear
that major changes would be needed anyway.


Now is a good time for making this kind of change: the next design
is already reasonably different from its predecessor (different
battery management, dual MCU, different geometry), so a new board
version will be needed anyway, and any change that has to be
introduced later will be significantly more costly than making
changes now.

We also have some ~6 boards with a CC2543. So even if the nRF51
should prove to be a total disaster, it would be relatively easy
to limp back.


Furthermore, Anelok has to find funding very soon or I won't be
able to continue working towards actually making this a product.
After plan A (crowd-investment), and plan B (OTF) have failed
miserably, plan C would be crowdfunding. This means that there
will be a tight schedule with very little room for changes once
the campaign succeeds.

Plus, I think it gives a better impression if there aren't lots of
loose ends at the time of starting a campaign. I know that one can
just not mention that endless to do list and all the basic
research still waiting to be done, but perhaps the world doesn't
need another myIDkey or Zano :)

- Werner

_______________________________________________
Qi Hardware Discussion List
Mail to list (members only): [email protected]
Subscribe or Unsubscribe: 
http://lists.en.qi-hardware.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to