Hi all, On 02.05.19 13:17, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote: > Considering the CoC, I'm refraining myself from talking too much about a > certain individual. > > As there seems to be some confusion as to how Daniel Pocock was able to > access > the subscriber emails of this list: > > The list is visible to all subscribers here: > https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/roster/discussion > > Having list membership visible to all subscribers is common practice, and > virtually all public mailing list are configured to show this information on > request. After all, the mailing list archive is also available, and by > scraping the mailing list archive one would be able to gather a similar list…
as explained by Johannes, this list was available to all list-subscribers as it is common practice. However, we now changed the settings and list-subscribers are only visible for list-admins from now on. > However, I'm pretty sure that using this information in the way that Mr. > Pocock did is very much not allowed under EU law. Maybe it's time to let the > legal team handle this transgression and evaluate FSFE's legal options? as already announced in the other mail, we get in contact with legal experts to act accordingly. Best, Erik -- No one shall ever be forced to use non-free software Erik Albers | Programme Manager, Communication | FSFE OpenPGP Key-ID: 0x8639DC81 on keys.gnupg.net _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct