Hi, Paul! Am 02.05.19 um 21:45 schrieb Paul Boddie: > It would obviously have been far more appropriate for Daniel to merely > advertise that another discussion venue has been set up and for him to invite > those who are interested to sign up for themselves. As far as I know, no such > invitation message has been propagated by this mailing list, but I do wonder > whether it might have been propagated had it been received.
From my experience with this mailing list (and others hosted by FSFE), I would absolutely have expected such an invitation to have been approved by the list moderators. I see that in the past, two kinds of messages have been rejected: * Messages that contain offensive language, and * Messages that violate the privacy of others (e.g. forwarding priate emails). > I would also encourage the FSFE leadership to use venues like this list to > more fully engage with the community, even when this involves encountering > dissent. I have actually experienced FSFE as an organisation that handles dissent in a very constructive manner. On the other hand, I see a fundamental difference between voicing dissent on one side and personal attacks, false claims, and conspiracy theories on the other. Thanks, -- Reinhard Müller * Financial Team Free Software Foundation Europe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
