<[email protected]> writes: > "Out of respect for Wayland's family, Debian needs to unilaterally > acknowledge something went wrong at Christmas 2018 and furthermore, > distance itself from the preaching of Molly de Blanc and other > amateur-hour enforcers." > > https://debian.community/remembering-lucy-wayland/ > > http://www.tuxmachines.org/node/133530
This is truly very sad. Debian contains nonfree software. Therefore it is a nonfree distro even if it contains such software only if the user requests it. I do not use Debian or care about their organization. They produce much software which benefits activists. But they hurt the free software message by justifying nonfree software use. Of course there are more important issues than software freedom. But Debian does not appeal to those. They appeal to having more users. Freedom is not having more users. Freedom is liberating people from the masters' control. Is it useful to help such a community that mistreats its users by making it correct its wrongs? It is better that such community dies by its mistakes. What do you think? _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
