[email protected] writes:

> i would add, caleb, that you certainly missed the point.
>
> for fucks sake, i think the linux kernel is better (for most purposes.)
>
> i think you might not be aware of the number of predictions about free
> software in the past year or two that have already come true. or you
> dont care-- but thats not my problem, you know.

I agree it is unsustained to say something without proof (as has done
Caleb). That is as valuable as dust in the desert.

I think that he is distracted by confusing asertions which are not
ordered or well communicated by you. I write this in a sincery well
intentioned effort to understand better your assertions because I really
have my own reasons to think the same way as you on most of your
assessments. The best would be one short statement with one proof per
parragraph. 

I still do not understand why Trisquel is bad. I personally know the
main developer, Ruben Rodríguez. I want to ask him about your worries. I
do not think that he will change his mind after you have already told
him. But I might be able to tell him in a more concise way to make them
more acceptable. Anyway, I would like to make my own decision about
Trisquel. For that, I need to understand what you say about it.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Ĝis!
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

Reply via email to