Hello Oron, There WERE claims about insufficient documentation of systemd components and interfaces - I wasn't kidding about this. The existence of those claims is acknowledged in: https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd#Various_other_sources
The same place also rebuts those claims, like you did in the following. --- Omer On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 15:10 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: > On Saturday 08 August 2015 04:50:18 Omer Zak wrote: > > Hello Lennart, > > ... > > Among all other claims against systemd, there were claims that its > > components and interfaces are insufficiently documented. What is the > > status of systemd components' documentation today? > > Omer, you've got to be kidding: > * systemd is one of the best documented projects -- I'll not even start to > compare with sysvinit ;-) > * You can begin with the tutorials under: > https://wiki.freedesktop.org/www/Software/systemd/#publications > * Then, you can always follow details in your trusty man-pages: > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man (linked from the > previous page). > * Also, as Lennart demonstrated "systemctl status <service>" show you the > available documentation for <service>. > > P.S: note that man-pages information is refactored. E.g: "man systemd-service" > is an extension of the generic "man systemd-unit", just > like "man systemd-exec" contain material that belongs to the execution > details in "man systemd-service" (as well as other execution contexts). > > Enjoy, -- Every good master plan involves building a time machine. Moshe Zadka My own blog is at http://www.zak.co.il/tddpirate/ My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone. They do not represent the official policy of any organization with which I may be affiliated in any way. WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html _______________________________________________ Discussions mailing list Discussions@hamakor.org.il http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions
