On Aug 4, 2003, Neil Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Oliva wrote:- >> I don't see how it would be possible for us to take a line >> change while processing a macro.
> I don't understand your last sentence. Since macros are always defined in a single logical line, I don't see how we could get a line change in the expansion of a macro. > Please test with this line > removed, if it has no regressions and it works for you then it is OK. Will do. > However, I'm not prepared to commit to preserving this behaviour. No issues here. I don't really care about what the behavior is, I care about getting the same debugging info regardless of whether separate or integrated preprocessing is used. Thanks, -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
