one thing i noticed when using cachecc1 with distcc is that distcc doesnt support some arguments cachecc1 is using for gcc -ifgcc3=<checksum> that maybe cachecc1 argument or something. But distcc with a cachecc1 integrated (optionaly) would be a nice thing :)
Aris On Thursday 18 December 2003 12:41, Benoit Poulot-Cazajous wrote: > Aris Basic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > did anyone try to use distcc with cachecc1 (this cache method looks > > faster then ccache) ? > > If yes , > > did you have to do something special to set it up (beside regualr > > cachecc1 and distcc setup)? > > did it work :) > > cachecc1+distcc does not work (yet). > > cachecc1 is the sum of two parts that require some work to cohabit with > distcc. 1) cachecc1 itself needs to talk directly to cc1/cc1plus and to > checksum it. May be it is possible to tell distcc to behave as cc1*, but > the checksum part looks rather difficult to do correctly. > 2) followcc1.so, the LD_PRELOAD stuff, is very easy to adapt to distcc, or > even ccache, and provides a nice alternative to "masquerade > directories". I have the feeling that, maybe, it should be integrated in > distcc as an addon. > > So, if you want to use a compiler cache with distcc, use ccache. > On the other hand, running cachecc1 from distccd should work without > problem. > > -- Benoit __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc