On 2 Feb 2004, Grahame Bowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 08:40, Martin Pool wrote: > > Useful and venerable though autoconf is, it's performance is pretty > > terrible even on unix. One of the distcc benchmarks is GNU hello, > > which takes about 15s to configure and 1s to compile. > > On this subject, has anyone heard of any useful autoconf replacement > projects? > > It seems like one of those problems that really needs to be solved > better, but is just too painful for anyone to get far, especially when > the current solution mostly works.
SCons rocks: http://distcc.samba.org/results.html#2003-01-28 -- Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
