On 25 May 2004, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (again, this time I've subscribed so no need to moderator to approve my 
> previous posting)

Hi,

I'm not sure I understand your bug report.  At any rate I can't
reproduce it.

free(0) is a valid call.  dmalloc should be at most giving a warning
about it, not aborting.  If you really want you can go through and put
"if (ptr)" in front of it.

Do you see any failures when not using dmalloc?  What about if you use
valgrind?

-- 
Martin 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

__ 
distcc mailing list            http://distcc.samba.org/
To unsubscribe or change options: 
http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc

Reply via email to