On 25 Aug 2004, Perochon Sebastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know what you're talking about, so maybe I will be out of subject > ;-), but when you say: > > "Normally running the preprocessor is so cheap compared to running the > remote compiler that it makes no difference." > > I can tell you that on our big project, it is not true. > Time to preprocess a file is very long due to lot of inclusion of headers > files, lot of use of define flags, ...
Can you tell me something about the CPU usage numbers from the verbose logs? > And because preprocessing is done on only the host computer, this is the > weak point of distcc in our project. Preprocessing time is what is limiting > the speed of distributed compilation time for us. -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
