On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:56:14 +0100, Lennart Poettering > Support for mDNS/DNS-SD doesn't contradict support for SLP. You're not > required to make use of zeroconf based on DNS-SD if you don't want > to. I am planning to implement zeroconf support by adding a special > pseudo hostname like "+zeroconf" or something like this for > DISTCC_HOSTS. Set it and use zeroconf or don't set it and don't use > it. It's that easy. If someone should implement for SLP based zeroconf > stuff he might want to add another pseudo hostname, perhaps "+slp" or > something like that. > > OK. What are the advantages of howl compared to others? > > It's the only implementation of mDNS/DNS-SD that is sufficently stable > and GPL-compatible. In addition it is the only implementation that is > currently available in Debian.
OK, that all sounds good to me. -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc