On 10 Jun 2005, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > I've installed distcc on two identical computers, each with two processors > > with hyperthreading (localhost and 10.0.0.3). > > > > Monitoring the computers with top, I can see that 10.0.0.3 does all (or > > most) of the compiling, while the pattern of localhost is like compiling > > with make -j1. (I've tried both -j8, -j12 and -j16 with -j8 beeing a bit > > slower than the rest. But compilling without distcc on samson alone > > with -j4 is just as fast as with distcc -j12 and -j16.) > > This is not the standard behavior. Which version of distcc are you using? > Did you compile it yourself? Any additional patch applied? > > Try using distccmon-gnome to monitor the job distribution, it may be more > helpful than top. Also watch the logs for errors. If distribution to > localhost fails, it should generate an error message at some point. > Setting DISTCC_VERBOSE=1 for the client may help. > > Which options did you run distccd with on both machines? Didn't you > forget to run distccd on localhost?
It's not necessary to run distccd on localhost; the jobs are run directly. Simon, please post the verbose log and the answer should be easy. -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc