On 14/09/05, George Garvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At the moment you can kill the main server and wait "long enough" for > > all the jobs to finish. Maybe someone could write a patch to make the > > server wait around for all the children. > > Sorry Martin. I don't understand what you're responding to. Perhaps > I miscommunciated, or misunderstood something.
Ah, when I said "you" I really meant the original poster, John Carter. He wanted (I think) to avoid lots of messages when shutting down servers, and I suggested that rather than suppressing the errors, it would be better to shut down the servers gracefully. > I'm a little surprised at needing to parse output from make to > determine if a build is successful, anyway. That sounds like a > disaster waiting to happen, and distcc is not the cause: parsing make > output is. Isn't that what exit codes are for? Sounds like a very > complicated build process, if it can't rely on make. I don't understand why you'd need to do that. -- Martin __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc