On 1/5/06, Victor Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your simpler implementation has obvious advantages and disadvantages, which > I'll enumerate: > ... > Disadvantages: > o when doing large builds, the load average on a machine can change > significantly, especially when multiple users are sharing the compilation > farm. Dmucs adapts to this situation automatically, whereas your solution > won't, as I understand it.
Right - my approach picks servers once, yours picks them with up-to-date information every time. I have ideas for coming closer to what you do, but haven't tried them yet. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
