hi, 1. no 2. there might be a lot of places where you can misslead your configuration, sending how you did it might help distcc_log migt be also helpfull, set export DISTCC_VERBOSE=1 DISTCC_LOG=path+to+file there is everything you need to debug. 3. yes, just set export DISTCC_FALLBACK=0 and inside DISTCC_HOSTS set only second machine.
regards Lukasz Łukasz Tasz RTKW 2017-10-10 3:32 GMT+02:00 Tim Aerts via distcc <distcc@lists.samba.org>: > Hi, > > I have two powerful Mac Pro machines. One is an 8-core, the other one is a > 12-core. Obviously, I would like to leverage all that power when I'm > building our enormous project from Xcode. > > So, I set up ccache on both Mac Pros. I can verify it is working > correctly. It really speeds up repetitive builds on the same machine. I see > correct stats using ccache -s. Then, I made it use distcc. It also works, > but distccmon-text always appears to say localhost. So I conclude that it > never actually uses the second machine. :( > > I don't think it's my network/firewall. Because I can successfully netcat > into the second machine from the first, using only its name and the default > port. > > 1. Could it be that the machine is simply too strong by itself, so that it > won't need the second one? > > 2. What else could be wrong? Any idea to what I might be missing? Maybe I > need to increase the value ccache -j returns somehow? (It is always 4 now, > which distcc seams to honour). > > 3. Is there any way to force it to use the other machine? (I tried > localhost/0 but that appears to be a parsing error these days, or at least > on macOS). > > Thanks in advance! > > — Tim > __ > distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ > To unsubscribe or change options: > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc