also sprach Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.19.2311 +0200]: > I have been maintaining a document for encouraging Fedora package > maintainers to upstream their patches and publishing reasons for doing > so at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream
I like it! I'd add one tip: talk to upstream and figure out how they want patches to be submitted. > I have been thinking of putting up a more generic variant of it in > the distribution wiki and pointing to that instead. I've linked it from http://vcs-pkg.org (which is starting to need a breaking down into subsections) and would be happy to have it there, since it is a packaging topic, and vcs-pkg is more about packaging while distributions@ was more intended for higher-level stuff. Let me know if you agree and/or need help. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "the most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not 'eureka!' but 'that's funny...'" -- isaac asimov spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Distributions mailing list Distributions@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distributions