On Monday 12 May 2008 13:01:41 Richard Purdie wrote: > Another random thought, how about injecting DATETIME into PV, so you'd > end up with something like: > > DATETIME-LOCALREV-SHASUM ? > > This means you'd always get increasing numbers but also get the features > of SRCREV. Only changing DATETIME if the revision has changed shouldn't > be too difficult to implement within the existing infrastructure...
I like that. :M:
