Phillip J. Eby wrote: > This is really good news, however. It appears to mean that slapping a copy > of my hacked 'site.py' (i.e., the one that honors .pth files along > PYTHONPATH) into the easy_install target directory would make > PYTHONPATH-based installs essentially DWIMmish. To complete the illusion, > I'd need to add some code to script wrappers to process the setuptools.pth > file in the script directory if pkg_resources can't be otherwise imported.
I think I kind of understand, but I'm not sure I have (or remember) the full context behind this proposal. What hacked site.py are we talking about? What exactly will the generated scripts look like in this model? -- Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
