-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Hammond wrote: >> At 04:00 PM 7/18/2007 +1000, Mark Hammond wrote: >>> This will result in both the final version of most bdist_* >> installations >>> having the architecture in the filename. It also has the >> nice side effect >>> of having the temp directories used by these commands include the >>> architecture in their names, meaning its possible to build >> multiple Windows >>> architectures from the same build tree, although that is not >> the primary >>> motivation. >> I presume the intention of this is to have it end up as either >> 'win32' or 'win64', yes? > > Probably 'win32', 'amd64' or 'itanium' - I'm not worried about the specific > strings, but there would need to be different ones for each of the 64bit > architectures.
Why would you use processor type IDs to indicate Windows-specifc platforms? Lots of systems running on AMD64 boxen don't run windows (can't say "lots" and "Itanium" in the same sentence, I guess, but I know for a fact that OpenVMS is running on Itanium, at least). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFGnqpU+gerLs4ltQ4RAj5PAJ4jKxm7Lqxx9hwXRaRZl69CLysQ6ACVEKAb ql/iXfN18/e9wmdYWKxnAQ== =8r02 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
