On Jul 22, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> WRT zc.buildout, refreshing a buildout with just ZODB installed in it >> takes about 45 seconds for me using PyPI and about 5 seconds using >> the experimental index. > > Can you kindly provide a measurement for the index at > http://cheeseshop.python.org/simple/ as well?
Yup. So, ATM: Using old PyPI takes about 1m5s Using simple takes about 25s Using ppix takes about 8s Some notes: - ZODB isn't the best example as it has download links to www.zope.org, making it take longer than packages without offsite links (relative to PyPI). - I expect that the difference between simple and ppix *for me* is a matter of geography. Refreshing an empty buildout checks the zc.buildout and setuptools packages. For that: Old PyPI takes 25s Simple takes 8s and ppix takes .5s Again, I assume that the difference between simple and ppix has more to do with geography than the difference between serving statically and dynamically. The simple page has more links on it than the ppix page, because I haven't gotten around to scarf all links off of a restructured-text rendering of long description. I doubt that makes any difference. It will be interesting to try again after I fix that. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
