Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 09:56 PM 7/24/2007 -0400, Stephen Waterbury wrote: >> I thought the point was to come up with a new distribution naming >> convention, > > Nope, just clarify the rules for *distinguishing* projects by name -- > a much less ambitious goal, since it's pretty easy to do with little > or no impact on existing projects. > > A new naming convention isn't in scope, since it would require a > "boil the ocean" renaming effort to implement, assuming you could get > everyone to agree in the first place.
Indeed. Boiling the ocean will have to wait. I still think putting multiple top-level packages in a single installable is a mistake. ;) Peace. Steve _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
