-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 zooko wrote: > If setuptools works on jython, what does it use for the "pyX.Y" part > of the egg names? > > And in the future hopefully IronPython, PyPy, and ShedSkin will join > the setuptools party. > > Does this revive our interest in supporting "100% Pure Python" eggs > that do not have an X.Y Python version number in their names? (Since > Python code without native extension modules is a lot more likely to > work on various versions of various implementations of Python than > Python code with native extension modules.)
What is the advantage of such a 'noarch' egg over just distributing 'sdist' tarballs (AKA "source eggs")? Setuptools / easy_install is happy to consume them, and I would much rather work with them. > Or will jython, IronPython, PyPy, and ShedSkin specify some X.Y > version of CPython that they support? I can't imagine any of the three being able to use non-source eggs compiled for CPython. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHliQe+gerLs4ltQ4RAqw3AJwPCwlCe41m9M6GR8ih7IYORWhkZQCgliAh SRchfLIlsDEbwrqhbrEpS2Y= =l0oA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
