On 16 maj 2008, at 15.47, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-05-16 15:28, Rasmus Andersson wrote:
On 16 maj 2008, at 15.00, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-05-15 22:33, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
<snip>
So there already is a lot of porting effort needed to support
a reasonable number of targets.
I don't think it takes a lot of effort to keep distutils
running with Python 2.3 and 2.4.
Speaking of which; is there any reliable statistics of Python
versions and platforms? Would be really interesting!
Reliable statistics are hard to obtain, since Python is distributed
along
with many Unix distributions, as part of many products, and also in
source form (where you basically lose any platform or Python version
information).
FWIW, these are the stats for our OSS Python package egenix-mx-base:
Downloads egenix-mx-base 3.0 in 2008:
Python 1.5.2: 0
Python 2.0 : 0
Python 2.1 : 31
Python 2.2 : 54
Python 2.3 : 483
Python 2.4 : 3368
Python 2.5 : 7504
Source ZIP : 4238
Source TGZ : 2918
These are just downloads, so likely new installations (the 3.0
version was released about one year ago). It's hard to tell what
the installed user base looks like, esp with respect to the used
Python versions.
Thank you. That's better than nothing alright!
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, May 16
2008)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________
:::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,MacOSX for
free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
