On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:24:18AM +0100, Paul Moore wrote: > 2009/4/9 Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:27, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 1. (Meta-requirement) I want to be able to download a Windows > >> installer[1] for *every* package I need. > > > > I would like to know why you have this requirement. Some sort of > > Windows binary, absolutely. But an installer? Would a package > > management GUI be enough? A Windows software that can install (and > > remove) eggs? > > Because I like to see my installed Python packages in Windows' > "Add/Remove Programs" list.
But that list is for *programs*, not *libraries*.
I'd understand a wish that a Python app (that also depends on twenty
other Python libraries) be bundled as a single Windows installer (that
contains all those twenty libraries inside) for an easy
next->next->next->finish installation.
I don't understand a desire of downloading twenty .exe files and
clicking on them all to get an app running. Did I misunderstand
something?
Marius Gedminas
--
Added mysterious, undocumented --scanflags and --fuzzy options.
-- nmap 3.0 announcement
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
