hellos, Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags?
Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on their software? Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a database. cheers, 2009/4/17 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> > 2009/4/16 "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de>: > >> I don't see it in the list (just LGPL without any version detail), I > >> am ccing this request to catalog-sig so > >> they can add it if they think it's wise > > > > How should this be done? As a separate classifier with the suffix v3, > > or as a subclassifier of LGPL? > > > > Looking at others (Mozilla Public License) I would go for a separate > one with the suffix. > > But what about LGPL 2 and 2.1 (It seems that 2.1 is introduces a lot > of changes) ? > > Maybe "LGPL2+" would be better for the 2.x series (and maybe 2+ includes v3 > ?) > > Maybe we could ask someone at the FSF so we have the best versions in > our Trove classifier. > > Regards > Tarek > > > Regards, > > Martin > > > > > > -- > Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > catalog-...@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig >
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
