On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:51 PM, P.J. Eby <[email protected]> wrote: > No. Such a directory does not represent an importable egg on sys.path. >
ok > If you mean an .egg file or directory that's directly on sys.path, then > that's a bit different. No I was talking about the .egg-info ones. > Are you planning to support those? In that event > you would need another EggInfo subclass anyway, and you could have the > directory (or "PathEntry", perhaps?) constructor simply wrap a single such > EggInfo in that event. I didn't plan to support other formats because I am in favor of a unique format. I do think having several formats lead to confusion. Tarek -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
