Paul Moore <[email protected]> writes: > I don't think "someone said they need it" is sufficient justification > by itself. I'm not trying to criticise the work done at PyCon, but I > think the discussions (and not just the conclusions) need to be > publicised better.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm asking for. Before making it more complex than it apparently needs to be, the justifications need to be subjected to public scrutiny and, if they don't survive, discarded. That doesn't pre-judge the outcome of such scrutiny: precisely the opposite, I *don't* want such additional complexity pre-judged as acceptable. -- \ “I am too firm in my consciousness of the marvelous to be ever | `\ fascinated by the mere supernatural …” —Joseph Conrad, _The | _o__) Shadow-Line_ | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
