On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:25:33 -0700, Sridhar Ratnakumar <[email protected]> wrote: > Yup, I'm aware of this. I was making a general comment that it is better > for package authors to register their packages in PyPI in such a way > that they have the 'Download URL' set properly to the actual tarball .. >...
> In fact, last week .. there was a first internal alpha of the tool which > at the moment can download and install packages from the internal binary > repository which has over 4000 package releases for mac/lin/win. ok - so on the one hand you are suggesting that people use pypi and then on the other you are suggesting that activestate will have its own package repository.... > Although, some important packages (eg: scipy, numpy, pyqt, etc..) are > not yet in the repository .. and we need to deal with these > build/metadata issues before making a public release. Aha - sounds good. David _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
